Rules for Writing a Dissertation Review from an Official Opponent

The defense of any scientific dissertation is a difficult matter, which must be approached very seriously. This stage is final after writing the corresponding scientific work. But to get to it, you need to go through a few more preparatory steps. And one of them is writing a https://www.paytowritepaper.com/ review from an official opponent.

As a rule, various scientists who are well versed in a particular field of knowledge act as reviewers in this case. They just can essentially paint all the pros and cons, as well as try to soberly evaluate the work with an uncluttered look. But in addition to competent content, the review must also have a specific design that does not contradict specific rules. And it is about them that we will talk in more detail today.

It is worth remembering that when writing your review, you can influence the dissertation committee itself, since it will, to a certain extent, rely on your opinion as a specialist when making a verdict. Therefore, you can both stretch the straw to the author of the dissertation, and drown him completely. Consequently, a rather serious responsibility falls on the shoulders of the reviewer.

As a rule, at the very end it is indicated whether the work meets the requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission, and the https://www.paytowritepaper.com/annotated-bibliography/ reviewer writes his opinion about whether the author of the dissertation deserves to receive the desired degree or not.

About the number of reviews

Since the topic covered in our today's article is quite voluminous, we want to cover it not only from the side of writing reviews, but also from the side of receiving them, since such things are directly interconnected. In fact, the Higher Attestation Commission does not set a certain limit on this account, so you can focus on an approximate figure. The optimal number is from six to ten reviews.

All abstracts should be sent to reviewers a month before the defense of the work, so that they have time to familiarize themselves with the information sent, and also be able to write detailed, good reviews. To avoid any misunderstandings, the author of the dissertation should supervise https://www.paytowritepaper.com/cpm-homework-help/ process himself, sending abstracts by e-mail with a request for review.

It would also be useful for applicants themselves to learn the rules for writing reviews in order to know approximately what exactly they should receive in the end from their planned reviewers.

More resources: Application of Empirical Research Methods When Writing Scientific Papers Unique Dissertations to Order Writing the Main Part of the Dissertation Where to Find the Dissertation Author Councils for the Defense of Dissertations